Oracle Contract Negotiation – Case Study: How a Retail Giant Saved 60% with Third-Party Support
Oracle Contract Negotiation – Case Study: How a Retail Giant Saved 60% with Third-Party Support
A global retail chain in North America faced high Oracle support expenses for its legacy systems, which limited funds for new customer-facing innovations.
The company made a bold move: it switched a portion of its Oracle portfolio to a third-party support provider, resulting in a 50% reduction in maintenance costs. The millions in savings were redirected into digital transformation projects.
While the move meant losing Oracle’s direct updates, the improved service and major cost reduction proved well worth it.
Client Background
- Industry & Region: Retail (Big-Box Stores), North America.
- Oracle Environment: The retailer operates an Oracle E-Business Suite (ERP) and an Oracle Database for inventory and financial management, both of which are heavily customized to meet its specific business needs. These systems are stable and have been supported by Oracle for years; however, the company has noticed diminishing returns, with few valuable patches or updates from Oracle, despite high support fees remaining in place.
Challenge
- High Cost, Low Value: Oracle’s annual support fees were consuming funds that could have been allocated to innovation, yet the aging Oracle systems remained stable and did not receive frequent updates. The company’s core Oracle ERP was in maintenance mode, paying steep fees for limited incremental value.
- Concerns About Third-Party Support: Transitioning from Oracle’s own support to a third-party provider was unconventional and carried risks. Oracle had taken legal stances against third-party support firms, and concerns arose about the timeliness of security patches, even if not issued by Oracle. The CIO had to ensure switching providers wouldn’t jeopardize system stability or compliance.
Approach
- Selective Transition & Planning: The retailer decided to shift support for its stable Oracle E-Business Suite and related databases to a reputable third-party provider (at roughly half of Oracle’s fee). It kept Oracle support only for a few critical components where future upgrades were anticipated. They negotiated a multi-year contract at roughly 50% of Oracle’s cost, including coverage for the retailer’s customizations and strong service SLAs that Oracle’s support lacked. The transition was timed to ensure that third-party support began the day Oracle support ended, thereby eliminating any coverage gap.
- Smooth Transition Execution: Leading up to the switch, the retailer downloaded the latest Oracle patches and documentation for its systems, knowing it would lose access to Oracle’s portal after support expiry. The third-party provider assigned a dedicated team familiar with the retailer’s Oracle environment and custom code. Users were informed of the new support contacts, but operations continued as normal.
Outcome & Results
- Lower Cost, Better Service: The move to third-party support slashed support costs for the covered Oracle systems by approximately 60%. For example, the Oracle support bill dropped from about $5 million annually to $2 million with the third-party provider. This roughly $3 million per year was immediately reallocated to strategic initiatives, such as e-commerce enhancements and in-store digital technology. The retailer also found that the third-party provider offered more personalized, responsive service. Because the third-party engineers focused on the retailer’s specific older software versions (and supported custom code), issues were resolved faster and in a more tailored manner than with Oracle’s support.
- No Business Disruption: After a full year post-transition, the Oracle ERP and databases continued to run smoothly. There were no major security incidents – the third-party patches and proactive monitoring kept systems secure and compliant with regulatory changes. The risk mitigations paid off – the company experienced no more issues than it had under Oracle support. Meanwhile, the business enjoyed new capabilities funded by the savings.
- Long-Term Strategy Flexibility: (Removed for brevity.) The cost savings allow for buying time and budget to thoughtfully plan the next generation of systems without pressure to upgrade for support reasons, thereby giving IT more strategic flexibility.
Key Takeaways
- Consider Support Alternatives for Stable Systems: If your Oracle environment is mature and not deriving significant value from vendor support, third-party support can significantly reduce costs while maintaining system stability. This retailer freed up millions by switching to non-updating systems.
- Hybrid Approach Reduces Risk: You don’t have to switch everything. This company maintained Oracle support for a few critical components and transitioned the rest, ensuring peace of mind in high-risk areas while still achieving significant savings elsewhere.
- Thorough Planning is Essential: switching support providers requires careful planning, including downloading patches, ensuring contract coverage of customizations, and coordinating the handover. Done right, users shouldn’t notice any difference in performance or reliability.
- Leverage Savings for Innovation: The goal of cost-cutting is to invest in growth and drive innovation. Redirect the savings to initiatives that modernize the business. For this retailer, third-party support wasn’t just cost reduction; it funded digital transformation.
- Know the Trade-offs: Third-party support means no automatic Oracle patches/upgrades. It’s best for systems that are stable and don’t need frequent vendor updates. Understand your license obligations and closely monitor security. With those caveats managed, it can be highly effective.
Read about our Oracle Contract Negotiation Service.
