Java licensing

Oracle Java License Renewals: Legacy Metrics vs. Employee-Based Model

Java License Renewals, consider the following steps

  • Audit Preparedness: Ensure all Java usage is compliant with current licensing.
  • Understand Your Needs: Assess whether your Java requirements justify current or expanded licensing.
  • Engage Oracle Early: Start discussions with Oracle before the renewal deadline to negotiate terms if necessary.
  • Complete Renewal Process: Follow Oracle’s procedure for renewal to secure continued support and updates.

Oracle Java License renewals

Oracle Java License renewals

Oracle’s recent shift to an employee-based Java SE subscription model has major cost and compliance implications for enterprises.

Organizations with existing Oracle Java licenses face a complex choice: attempt to renew under legacy metrics (per user or processor) with Oracle’s strict audit conditions, or move to the new Universal Subscription that covers all employees at a significantly higher cost.

This advisory outlines the challenges of renewing legacy Java contracts, the financial implications of Oracle’s all-employee model, and strategies for negotiating and planning an exit if necessary.

Oracle’s Licensing Shift: Legacy vs. Employee Model

Oracle dramatically changed its Java SE licensing in 2023, moving from legacy metrics to an employee-count model.

Under the legacy Java SE subscriptions (sold from 2019 to 2022), licenses were based on Named User Plus (NUP) or Processor counts. This meant companies only paid for the specific users or servers running Oracle Java.

For example:

  • Named User Plus (NUP) – license per named user (or device) running Java. If 100 people used Java, you paid for 100 users.
  • Processor – license per server CPU where Java was installed (with multi-core factor rules). This covered an unlimited number of users on that server.

These legacy subscriptions tied the cost to actual Java usage. A company with 200 Java users might pay roughly $2.50 per user/month (about $6,000 per year) under the old model – an expense proportional to usage.

New Employee-Based Model: As of January 2023, Oracle requires a Java SE Universal Subscription based on the total number of employees. Every employee, contractor, and part-time staff in the organization must be licensed, regardless of how many use Java. It functions like an enterprise site license: you pay for your entire headcount.

This decouples cost from usage and can significantly increase expenses for most firms. Oracle’s rationale is “simplified” licensing (no need to count individual installations), but the result is a one-size-fits-all fee covering even employees who never use Java. Organizations that previously only licensed a subset of users now face the prospect of paying for everyone.

Why Companies Care:

The shift means higher costs and reduced flexibility. Under legacy terms, if you decommissioned some Java-using systems or had only a niche team using Java, you could keep costs low. Now, even minimal Java usage triggers an enterprise-wide subscription. Many businesses are caught off guard by this change, especially during renewals when Oracle prompts them to transition to the new model.

Renewing Java Under Legacy Metrics: Audit and Approval

For those “lucky” enough to already have legacy Java SE subscriptions, it is technically possible to renew under the old metrics, but Oracle makes it challenging.

Renewing legacy Java licenses is not an automatic process; Oracle must approve the renewal, and that approval comes with conditions:

  • Mandatory Usage Audit: Oracle will validate your current Java usage before renewal. In practice, this means an Oracle-driven license review, also known as a “soft audit.” You will be asked to provide detailed data on all Java installations, users, and servers in your environment. Oracle wants to confirm that your usage is within the limits of your existing NUP or Processor licenses. If you have more installations or users than you originally licensed, you’re deemed non-compliant.
  • No Expansion of Legacy Contracts: Oracle typically allows renewal only for the previous quantity of licenses you bought – no increase. If you need more licenses than before, they will likely refuse to sell additional legacy licenses. (Oracle removed these SKUs from its price list in 2023.) Needing more coverage usually forces a switch to the employee metric model.
  • No Reduction without Scrutiny: If you attempt to renew a significantly lower quantity (e.g., after a Java cleanup initiative), Oracle may question it. A drastic drop in your subscription count could signal to Oracle that you had unlicensed usage that was simply removed. Oracle’s approval is discretionary – they may insist on renewing at the original volumes if they suspect your prior usage was higher than reported.
  • Oracle’s Discretion: Ultimately, Oracle can refuse a legacy renewal. There have been cases where Oracle has declined to renew older Java contracts and instead pushed the customer onto the new model. Oracle often includes language in renewal quotes indicating it might be the last allowed renewal on legacy terms. In short, continuing on the old metrics is on borrowed time, entirely at Oracle’s mercy.

Risk of Audit Non-Compliance: If the audit finds you exceeded your licensed counts (even by a small margin), Oracle will not let you simply buy a few more legacy licenses to cover it. Since the old licenses are no longer sold, the remedy offered is to migrate to the employee-based subscription for the whole company.

This could result in an immediate and substantial cost increase. Oracle may issue an ultimatum: either stay strictly within your original license counts (possibly uninstalling any excess Java usage) or move to the new all-employee model.

Any compliance gap gives Oracle leverage to upsell the pricier model, often with back-dated fees or penalties for the unlicensed period.

In summary, renewing under legacy metrics can save money, but it comes with an onerous audit process and no guarantee of successs.

Organizations attempting it must be extremely confident in their Java deployment data and prepared for Oracle to scrutinize (or challenge) their compliance.

Employee-Based Model: Cost Structure and Impact

Oracle’s Java SE Universal Subscription (Employee Metric) shifts Java licensing to a subscription based on total headcount. This model greatly simplifies counting – one license covers all usage – but at the expense of significantly higher cost for most.

Key characteristics of the employee-based model include:

  • All Employees Count: Oracle defines “employee” broadly to include full-time, part-time, temporary staff, and contractors that work for the company. Essentially, if your organization has 5,000 people on payroll (and supporting contractors), you must license all 5,000, even if only a small fraction actively use Java. There’s no partial licensing – it’s an enterprise-wide coverage.
  • Tiered Pricing: The list price per employee decreases with higher volumes; however, the overall cost remains high. Below is Oracle’s standard Java SE Universal Subscription pricing (2023) by volume:

Oracle Java SE Subscription – Volume Pricing (Employee Metric)

Total Employees LicensedPrice per Employee/Month (USD)
1 – 999$15.00
1,000 – 2,999$12.00
3,000 – 9,999$10.50
10,000 – 19,999$8.25
20,000 – 29,999$6.75
30,000 – 39,999$5.70
40,000 – 49,999$5.25
50,000+Negotiated

Larger enterprises get a lower unit price, but the absolute spend is enormous.

For example, a company with 5,000 employees falls in the $10.50 tier – that’s roughly $630,000 per year (5,000 × $10.50 × 12 months).

A firm with 28,000 employees would pay around $2.3 million annually at list prices. Even a smaller business of 500 staff would owe $90,000/year if paying $15 per employee.

These figures represent a huge increase compared to legacy licensing for limited Java users. Under the old model, if only 50-100 people or a handful of servers needed Java, the annual cost might have been in the low tens of thousands (or less).

Now the cost easily jumps to six or seven figures because it scales with organization size, not actual usage.

  • Budget Shock: Many organizations experience two to five times, or even ten times, or more increases in Java licensing costs when transitioning to the employee model. If you previously spent $ 100,000/year under NUP/Processor licenses, it’s not uncommon to see a quote of $ 500,000+ under the new scheme. Some Oracle customers have reported price hikes of 1000% or more at renewal when forced into an employee-based deal. This often comes as a shock to IT and finance teams, since you’re paying for “shelfware” licenses (covering employees who never use Java).
  • Predictable but Unrelated to Usage: On the plus side, the employee subscription is a fixed annual or multi-year fee that’s predictable (tied to headcount). It eliminates the need to count individual installations or users each year, in theory simplifying compliance. For organizations that truly have Java everywhere (e.g., thousands of Java applications enterprise-wide), a universal license can ensure nobody is left unlicensed. However, for many companies, Java usage is not truly universal, making this model cost-inefficient.
  • Coverage of All Environments: The universal subscription covers Java use on desktops, servers, and the cloud. It is comprehensive – any use of Oracle Java SE within the company is permitted as long as the subscription is maintained. This can reduce worry about accidental unlicensed installs (no need to constantly track every instance once you’re all-in). In essence, it trades money for peace of mind on compliance.

Financially, the employee model often feels like using a sledgehammer for a small nail: it covers everything broadly, but you pay for far more than you use. The cost-per-Java-user is extremely high if only a minority of staff use Java.

For example, a bank with 10,000 employees might only have 1,000 developers and users running Java, yet they must pay for all 10,000, resulting in potentially millions of dollars per year, versus maybe around $ 100,000 under the old model. This inefficiency is a primary concern for CFOs and CIOs assessing the renewal.

Risks and Challenges of the Employee Model (Compliance & Exit)

Moving to Oracle’s employee-based Java subscription may solve one compliance problem (it covers any Java usage while active), but it introduces new risks and challenges:

  • Lock-In and Exit Difficulty: The Java SE subscription is not perpetual – it’s a term-based subscription. If, at the end of your contract, you choose not to renew, you will lose the right to use Oracle Java going forward. This means an organization must be prepared to uninstall all Oracle Java software or replace it with an alternative by the time the subscription expires. Exiting the agreement is difficult in practice, as you need to ensure that every instance of Oracle Java in the environment is removed or replaced (including old versions on employee laptops, application servers, and build environments). Oracle may require certification or evidence that you have fully purged their software. Failing to do so means any remaining Java installations would be unlicensed, exposing the company to compliance penalties. In short, once you adopt the all-employee model, backing out requires planning and effort comparable to a large IT migration project.
  • Audit Exposure After Term: Oracle is known to audit customers who let subscriptions lapse. If you exit the employee-based license, you should expect Oracle to verify that you are no longer running Oracle Java. Organizations need thorough records (screenshots, removal logs, inventory scans) proving that Oracle JDK/JRE was removed from all systems. Implement policies to prevent any reinstallation of Oracle Java (for example, blocking it via software management tools), as a stray install after exit could trigger a compliance issue. The need to prove a negative (that nothing is left) makes the exit process nerve-wracking and requires confidence in your software asset management.
  • Cost Tied to Employee Growth: In the employee model, your costs can increase automatically as the company grows. If you hire more staff or acquire another company, the Java subscription cost will rise because the license is based on total headcount. Even if your Java usage doesn’t expand, a bigger employee base means a higher bill at the next true-up or renewal. This makes budgeting tricky – your Java licensing spend is now linked to HR metrics rather than technology usage. An organization could reduce its Java footprint, but still pay more if the workforce grew.
  • Broad Employee Definition: Oracle’s expansive definition of “employee” means you cannot exclude contractors, consultants, or part-timers to lower the count. Almost everyone who works for or with your organization counts. This closes common loopholes and ensures the licensed number stays high. There is also a risk of disputes: if Oracle believes your declared employee count is too low (e.g., not counting certain affiliates or outsourced teams), they might challenge it. In a worst-case scenario, Oracle could audit your HR records to verify the count, leading to penalties if you underreport.
  • Less Flexibility & Negotiating Leverage: With legacy licensing, customers had options to control costs, for instance, by limiting Java to specific systems or dropping licenses if not needed. With the all-in model, it’s all or nothing. You’re committing to Oracle’s pricing for the entire enterprise. If Oracle raises subscription prices or changes terms, you have little recourse except to pay or undertake the difficult path of removing Java entirely. This one-size model can also make future negotiations more challenging – Oracle knows you rely on them for 100% of your Java usage. Your only leverage is the nuclear option: migrating off Oracle Java.

Organizations should weigh these risks carefully. The employee model can reduce day-to-day compliance headaches (Oracle won’t audit specific Java installations if you’ve paid for everyone), but it creates a strategic dependency on Oracle.

Before committing, ensure you have an exit strategy, such as a plan to transition to OpenJDK or another Java distribution if costs become unsustainable.

It’s crucial to manage expectations with stakeholders, as leaving the Oracle agreement in the future will require careful planning, thorough testing, and strict software governance to avoid falling out of compliance.

Optimizing Your Java Licensing Strategy

Given Oracle’s tactics and the high stakes, enterprises should take a strategic approach to Java licensing:

  • Evaluate Alternatives: Not all organizations must remain on Oracle’s Java build. There are open-source and third-party Java distributions (e.g. Eclipse Temurin (Adoptium), Amazon Corretto, Azul Zulu, Red Hat OpenJDK) that provide Java without licensing fees. Many are binary-compatible with Oracle Java and get regular updates. Consider if you can replace Oracle JDK on some or all systems with these alternatives. This could drastically reduce or eliminate your need for an Oracle subscription. However, ensure you have a plan for updates and support – some firms purchase support from vendors like Red Hat or Azul for their OpenJDK deployments at a fraction of Oracle’s cost.
  • Rightsize Your Usage (Java Cleanup): Before renewal or negotiations, conduct an internal audit of your Java usage. Identify where Oracle Java is needed, and uninstall it from devices and servers that don’t truly require it. Often, older versions or unused installations linger on machines. By reducing your Java footprint, you may lower the necessary license counts (if still using legacy metrics) or gain confidence to fully remove Java later. Some organizations have successfully minimized their use of Java to just a few applications, making a switch to alternatives easier. Be cautious: any reductions should be completed before Oracle’s official audit/validation and thoroughly documented.
  • Leverage Renewal Timing: If you have an active legacy Java subscription, use the remaining time to plan your next steps. Oracle may allow one more renewal on legacy terms – this can buy 1-3 years. During that period, execute your plan to migrate applications away from Oracle Java or secure budget for the inevitable employee-model costs. Treat the legacy renewal as a grace period to strategize, not as a given long-term solution. Oracle is signaling that legacy licenses will eventually end, so use the time wisely.
  • Negotiate Aggressively: Should you need to move to the employee model, negotiate for the best possible terms. Oracle’s price tiers are published, but there is often room for additional discounting, especially if your alternative is to walk away. Tactics for negotiation include:
    • Multi-Year Commitments: Oracle may give a discount if you sign a 3-year or 5-year term upfront. Larger, longer deals usually see better pricing per employee (and Oracle may waive some backdated compliance fees if you agree to a longer term). Be cautious with long commitments, though – ensure you truly need Oracle for that duration.
    • Bundling and Volume Discounts: If your organization also conducts significant business with Oracle (databases, applications, ULAs, etc.), you may consider bundling the Java deal into a larger enterprise agreement. Leverage your overall Oracle spend to seek concessions. Show Oracle the comparison of how much more their offer is versus your legacy spend or versus switching to an OpenJDK – make it clear that the deal needs to improve for you to stay.
    • Benchmark and Push Back: Come prepared with pricing benchmarks from peers or industry reports. If you know that other companies have, say, a 50% discount off the list or capped pricing for a set headcount, bring that up. Oracle sales reps have some flexibility, especially at quarter or year-end. Also, clarify the definition of ’employee’ in the contract – for instance, if there are parts of your organization with no IT infrastructure, consider excluding them by structuring the deal with specific entities or a controlled headcount number. Every employee not counted is a savings.
  • Plan for Compliance in Writing: If you do adopt the employee subscription, maintain strict controls to track Oracle Java deployments. Even though you’re covered during the term, you’ll need this information if you later try to exit (to know what to remove). Maintain an up-to-date inventory of all Oracle Java installations and ensure that new deployments undergo a change control process. This makes eventual migration to alternatives (if needed) more orderly. Additionally, document any correspondence and commitments from Oracle – for example, if Oracle “approves” a legacy renewal, record that confirmation. This could protect you if there’s a dispute later about what was agreed.

In essence, the most effective strategy is to remain proactive. Don’t wait for Oracle to dictate terms at renewal time. Understand your usage and options early.

Some organizations form an internal task force (IT, procurement, and compliance teams) specifically to handle Oracle Java licensing well before the renewal deadline.

By doing so, you can approach Oracle on the front foot – either with a clean environment ready to negotiate a fair deal, or with a migration plan that gives you leverage to decline an unfair one.

Recommendations

  • Audit Your Java Usage Now: Inventory all Oracle Java installations (servers, VMs, desktops) and track how many users or applications truly need Oracle’s Java. This is critical for either negotiating a renewal or planning an exit.
  • Renew Legacy Contracts (If Possible) to Buy Time: If you have legacy Java SE subscriptions, consider renewing them under those terms to delay the switch to the employee model. Use that extra year (or term) to prepare, but assume Oracle will enforce an audit during the renewal. Only a promise license counts; you can justify it with data.
  • Prepare for Oracle’s Audit Tactics: Be ready to share deployment data, but only what is asked and required. Double-check your numbers to ensure you are compliant with existing licenses before Oracle validates. Engage license management experts if needed to navigate Oracle’s questions and avoid oversharing irrelevant data.
  • Evaluate the Employee Model vs. Alternatives: Get an official quote from Oracle for the employee-based subscription to understand the cost impact. In parallel, evaluate alternative strategies (like migrating to OpenJDK or getting support from third parties). Compare the long-term costs. Often, showing Oracle that you have a viable alternative can lead them to offer a more reasonable discount on the subscription.
  • Negotiate Multi-Year and Discounts: If transitioning to the employee model is unavoidable, negotiate for a multi-year agreement with locked-in pricing. Aim for a maximum volume discount or a custom price that reflects your actual usage. Oracle will often come down from the list price, but only if you push. Highlight any past compliance you maintained and the fact that the new costs are a hardship – every bit of justification helps in negotiations.
  • Plan an Exit Strategy (Worst-Case): Even as you negotiate, have a contingency plan to exit the Oracle Java subscription in the future. Identify which applications could be moved to OpenJDK, schedule necessary testing, and budget for resources to replace Oracle’s Java if needed. Treat it like preparing for a cloud migration or any major tech shift – plan the steps and timeline. This way, if Oracle’s terms become unsustainable, you can confidently pivot without scrambling.
  • Document and Prove Removal When Exiting: If you decide not to renew, meticulously remove Oracle Java from all environments by the end of the term. Keep evidence (such as uninstall logs and screenshots from software inventory tools) to demonstrate your compliance. This will serve as your safeguard if Oracle audits you after termination. Ensuring no stragglers remain (and preventing reinstallation) protects you from surprise bills later.
  • Stay Informed: Oracle’s licensing policies are subject to change. Keep an eye on Oracle announcements, licensing advisories, and industry news regarding Java SE. Early awareness of changes (like price hikes or policy tweaks) can save your organization from costly surprises. Consider joining user groups or forums where other companies share their experiences and tactics with Java licensing.

Checklist: 5 Key Actions for Managing Java License Renewals

  1. Discover and Inventory Java Usage: Identify all Oracle Java installations in your IT landscape. Utilize discovery tools or software asset management processes to identify where Java is running (on servers, clients, or applications) and who is using it. This forms the foundation for any licensing decision or negotiation.
  2. Review Current Licenses and Contracts: Gather your Oracle Java SE subscription agreements (legacy NUP/Processor contracts or current employee-based contracts). Note renewal dates, quantities, and any clauses about renewal or termination. Determine if you are eligible to renew under legacy terms and identify the applicable conditions.
  3. Optimize Your Java Footprint: Remove or replace Oracle Java in areas where it’s not needed. Uninstall Java from unused instances and explore replacing Oracle JDK with open-source Java on non-critical systems to reduce dependence. Ensure that after this cleanup, your usage is lean and well-documented – ideally within your existing license counts.
  4. Cost Analysis and Scenario Planning: Calculate the cost of staying on the legacy system versus moving to the employee model. Request pricing from Oracle for the employee metric and compare it to your current spend. Additionally, estimate the costs of alternative solutions (e.g., support for OpenJDK or another vendor’s Java). Develop scenarios: (a) renew legacy for one more term, (b) switch to employee model, (c) migrate off Oracle Java. Evaluate the financial and operational impact of each path.
  5. Engage Stakeholders and Form a Negotiation Strategy: Align with your CIO, CFO, and procurement team on the preferred approach. When negotiating with Oracle, determine your walk-away conditions (e.g., a price threshold or a requirement for a multi-year contract). Prepare data and a clear story for Oracle, such as the number of actual Java users versus employees, to support a better deal. Involve legal or licensing experts to review any new contract terms. If planning to exit, ensure management supports the investment in migrating technology to avoid licensing fees.

By following this checklist, you’ll be well-prepared whether you aim to renew under legacy terms, adopt Oracle’s new model, or leave the Oracle Java ecosystem entirely.

FAQ

Q1: Can we still renew our Oracle Java licenses under the old metrics (per user or processor)?
A: If your organization already has legacy Java SE subscriptions (from before 2023), Oracle allows you to attempt renewal on those terms for now. However, renewal is not guaranteed – Oracle will require a compliance review to ensure your current Java usage doesn’t exceed what you originally licensed. You cannot increase your license count under legacy terms (no new legacy licenses are sold). If you pass the audit and Oracle agrees, you may be eligible for a one-time renewal of the same quantities. Be aware that Oracle often inserts clauses stating that this will be the final renewal on the old model. If you’ve never had a Java subscription or your legacy contract has lapsed, you cannot obtain new licenses on the old model – you’ll have to use the employee-based subscription going forward.

Q2: What is Oracle’s employee-based Java subscription, and how is it priced?
A: The Java SE Universal Subscription (employee metric) is Oracle’s current licensing model for Java. Instead of counting specific users or CPUs, it requires licensing every employee in your organization. The pricing is tiered by headcount – for example, approximately $15 per employee per month for a small company, scaling down to around $5-6 per employee at very large employee counts. In practical terms, even if only 50 people use Java, a company of 5,000 employees would have to pay for all 5,000. This often results in a much higher annual fee than the old “per user” model. Oracle positions this as a simpler model (one license covers all Java use enterprise-wide). The cost can range from tens of thousands of dollars for very small businesses to millions of dollars per year for large enterprises, due to the broad scope of the metric.

Q3: Why is the new Java license so much more expensive for us compared to our previous contract?
A: The employee-based model decouples the cost from actual Java usage. Under your previous per-user or per-processor contract, you paid only for the known users or systems running Java. If you only had 100 users or a handful of servers, costs were relatively low. Now, Oracle charges for every employee on payroll, which might be hundreds or thousands of people who don’t use Java at all. Essentially, you’re buying a blanket license for potential usage. This “safety net” comes at a high price – you’re covering a lot of non-users. The model can easily multiply costs 5-10x because it treats a company with limited Java use the same as one that uses Java everywhere. Additionally, Oracle significantly raised the pricing in this transition (it wasn’t designed to be cost-neutral). The new scheme is inherently more expensive in most cases, sometimes viewed as Oracle monetizing Java more aggressively now that it’s a paid product.

Q4: What happens if we choose not to renew our Java subscription?
A: If you decide not to renew an Oracle Java SE subscription (whether legacy or employee model), you lose the legal right to continue using Oracle’s Java software beyond the subscription end date. This means that before your contract expires, you must remove Oracle Java from all systems or replace it with an alternative (such as OpenJDK or other Java distributions). There is no grace period after expiration; any continued use of Oracle Java would be considered unauthorized and could trigger compliance action. It’s critical to have a de-installation plan: inventory every instance of Oracle Java, uninstall them, and confirm that no Oracle JDK/JRE remains in use. Many organizations migrate to free OpenJDK builds for their applications as part of this process. After exit, be prepared to demonstrate to Oracle (if audited) that you have indeed stopped using their software. In short, not renewing is feasible, but only if you stop using Oracle Java entirely by the end of the term.

Q5: How can we reduce our Java licensing costs or negotiate a better deal with Oracle?
A: There are several strategies to manage or lower the cost:

Get Expert Help: Oracle licensing is complex, and their sales tactics can be aggressive. Consider consulting with a software licensing expert or a firm specializing in Oracle contracts. They can provide benchmark pricing data and help craft negotiation strategies. Experts can also conduct a license audit internally, so you know your position before Oracle’s audit. The cost of advice can be far lower than overpaying for a subscription for years.
Ultimately, controlling Java licensing costs may involve a combination of technical measures (reducing usage) and contractual expertise (negotiating effectively and understanding your options). Each organization’s situation is different, but being proactive and informed is the best way to avoid overspending. Voiding unnecessary costs and positioning for optimal long-term licensing outcomes.

Optimize Usage: First, ensure you’re not paying for unnecessary use. Eliminate redundant Java installations and consider if all environments need Oracle’s version. Sometimes legacy applications can run on open-source Java with minimal changes, reducing how much Oracle-licensed Java you need (or whether you need it at all).

Consider Alternatives: Evaluate open-source Java options (like Eclipse Temurin, Amazon Corretto, etc.), which are free. If they meet your technical requirements, you can use them in place of Oracle Java and significantly reduce costs (potentially only paying a third-party support vendor if you require assistance). Even a hybrid approach – using Oracle for certain critical apps and open-source for others – can reduce license counts.

Leverage Negotiation: When dealing with Oracle, use your actual Java usage and alternative options as leverage. Let Oracle know you are prepared to switch away if the offer isn’t reasonable. Aim for multi-year discounts – Oracle might cut the per-employee price if you commit to, say, a 3-year term. Also, align the Java deal timing with any larger Oracle negotiations if possible; a holistic deal might yield concessions. Always negotiate – the first quote from Oracle is typically list price, and there’s often room for better terms if they sense you might walk away.

Read about our Java Advisory Services.

🎥 How Redress Compliance Helps You Avoid Oracle Java Audit Fees | Java Licensing & Audit Defense

Would you like to discuss our Java Advisory Services with us?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name

Author

  • Fredrik Filipsson

    Fredrik Filipsson brings 20 years of dedicated Oracle licensing expertise, spanning both the vendor and advisory sides. He spent nine years at Oracle, where he gained deep, hands-on knowledge of Oracle’s licensing models, compliance programs, and negotiation tactics. For the past 11 years, Filipsson has focused exclusively on Oracle license consulting, helping global enterprises navigate audits, optimize contracts, and reduce costs. His career has been built around understanding the complexities of Oracle licensing, from on-premise agreements to modern cloud subscriptions, making him a trusted advisor for organizations seeking to protect their interests and maximize value.

    View all posts